quote:

---

KillerBananas wrote:

Stratobastard: "so what exactly does the 2nd circuit in the RBTC do then?"

It does what it is supposed to do!

---

quote:

---

KillerBananas wrote:
And Rezi, RBTC= Robert "the Bruce" Tone Circuit

---

quote:

---

mijfenders wrote:

1. However, till you guys stop hiding behind your screen names and produce some verifiable evidence of your actual identities then what's to discuss with you, like I wrote, you are just more talking heads, because you choose to remain annonomous. You can sit there posting all the defamatory sh1te you like about me or my products, but till you have real identities, why would I care, it's meaningless. The RBTC continues to sell well despite the best efforts of the dawk-fan-boys to spoil it, with their ludricious claims that it doesn't work etc etc.

2. You have even heard from independent board members Stratman70 and KIllerBanannas that the RBTC does what it claims to do, so actually what is there to discuss anyway?

---

quote:

---

Creamstrat wrote:

This is turning into quite an epic.

---

quote:

---

mijfenders wrote:

1. Rezi: Like I wrote before I'm very happy to discuss the RBTC in any level of detail you want to go into ONCE you and the other fan-boys who want to participate, put-up with who they actually are in real life. That way everyone is dealing on the same basis, rather than as it stands just now where you and any of the other annonomous posters are able to say absolutely anything and then hide behind their annonimity again. I'm not interested in attempting a serious discussion with a group of empty talking heads for what I would have though might be fairly obvious reasons. Your argument about open discussions reagrding products by consumers is fine I understand that, and you have the manufacturer here willing and ready to discuss the product, however that does not mean I'm here willing and ready to be defamed by a bunch of annonomous talking heads who are simply making ridiculous claims about my products they cannot support in any way. By the way if you want to subject the RBTC to your "critical appraisal" you should note that there are NO claims anywhere that the RBTC was made for, or used by Blackmore, nor are there any claims that I was ever his tech, or his best buddy either. It is those type of claims that have prompted the discussion about Dawk and the questions about what he did or didn't do for Blackmore.

2. Now, because Blackmore himself has told you very clearly via video clips that HE did his own scallop work( which was a large part of the work Dawk claims he did!)you have now decided to change the debate from "did Dawk do the work he claimed for Blackmore" into a debate about whether the RBTC has any validity related to Blackmore. Best that you realise, that the RBTC has already made it's mark in terms of buyers seeking to get a "blackmoresque" sound but much much more importantly also with many more players who are not even faintly interested in the "Blackmore" sound at all. In other words, the Blackmore part of the RBTC market is very small compared to other applications for it. Also the RBTC is demonstrated in soundclips, of course by me, but also by variou sindependent clips, including some produced here by Stratman70. I recall he posted a clip and said guess if it has an RBTC used in it, which it did and how many guessed it and how many said they liked the sound. Ask youself why the manufacturer of the MTC has produced NO clips at all for their product themselves!

Ok Rezi, so WHEN you and the other guys are prepared to put up your identities and when you , as a forum moderator, setup a specific topic to discuss the RBTC then we can get to it and atually discuss something properly.

3. I'm sure you will understand why it has to be that way.

Till then, the way it stands is YOU have heard the WORDS of Blackmore himself telling you HE did his own scallop work and why would he lie? I beleived him, so why can't you ? ( that's how you put it, about the magazing articles you produced isn't it ?) At the same time, during this same video review of his guitar collection, while Blackmore himself was telling you HE did his OWN scallop work,

4. he didn't make ANY mention of his tech Mr Dawk or the MTC or anything else related to his guitars that suggested anyone other then Balckmore himself worked on them. He even talked about these "new sensor pickups" on the model he helped Fender design.

Time will tell.

---