Rotoworld reporting 49ers favorite to land Lance Briggs ~ at Runboard.com
Please
Read Rules Click for Rules
GAMEBALL
THURSDAY
LINCECUM
THE
JERK
EUGENIO
The
GIANTS
Lost


ALL Open Forum Baseball Bonds ATT Park FAQ&Admin

v
GIANTSBOARD.COM
 SPORTS INFERIOR TO BASEBALL
  Rotoworld reporting 49ers favorite to land Lance Briggs
Support
Search

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2 

 
losgigantes
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 12-2007
Location: South Bay
Posts: 1192
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Rotoworld reporting 49ers favorite to land Lance Briggs


http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&hl=113074&id=1655

"...Jensen adds that impending free agent Lance Briggs is slated to sign with San Francisco."

------------


emoticon

Is it just me, or is our defense gonna be a facking potential MONSTER next year? Briggs is a big time pass rusher (and a monster in coverage).

emoticon

On the other side of the ball, I would be shocked if we didn't get a big upgrade at WR. Word around the campfire is that Bernard Berrian WANTS to play here, and he would automatically make our WR corps improved. He is a big play guy with great hands... something i'm sure TEH MAD MARTZ is down with.

 emoticon

---
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little." - GEORGE CARLIN
2/27/2008, 10:29 am   
 
209Giant
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 04-2007
Location: Above the Fray
Posts: 3262
Reply | Quote



Berrian's from the Central Valley, so he'd be playing close to home.
2/27/2008, 1:32 pm   
 
bayareasportsfan755
ALL-STAR POSTER
Global user

Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 498
Reply | Quote



Really? You think Briggs is a good pass rusher? He's not horrible, but he's certainly not a big time pass rusher. He's had 5 sacks in 5 seasons.

He is one of the best coverage linebackers in the NFL, however.

Berrian will probably get the most money out of all WR free agents this offseason, but I don't think he's the best one available. Hackett is better IMO.
2/27/2008, 8:44 pm   
 
losgigantes
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 12-2007
Location: South Bay
Posts: 1192
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: …


quote:

bayareasportsfan755 wrote:

Really? You think Briggs is a good pass rusher? He's not horrible, but he's certainly not a big time pass rusher. He's had 5 sacks in 5 seasons.

He is one of the best coverage linebackers in the NFL, however.

Berrian will probably get the most money out of all WR free agents this offseason, but I don't think he's the best one available. Hackett is better IMO.



Sometimes numbers don't add up, I know, but according to scouts inc scouting report:

2007 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc.
Grade: 81 | Key
Alert: None

Comment: The Bears used their franchise tag on Briggs in order to keep him in Chicago, where he is surrounded by exceptional players. Briggs is a fine playmaker in his own right and is reaching his prime. He is a fine player against the run and rushing the passer, but as a cover guy, there are few in Briggs' league. He has outstanding range, gets very deep in his drops, can cover running backs and tight ends man-to-man and also has fine ball skills and hands for the interception. He is tough, very durable and reliable. While he is a fine fit in the Tampa 2 scheme as a weakside linebacker, he has the skill set to excel in numerous schemes. As weakside linebackers go, Briggs has excellent size and a strong thick body. He has made more than 100 tackles in each of the past three seasons, including 134 in 2006. He is also good for a few takeaways every year. He plays the game in balance, rarely looks awkward and consistently maintains proper football position, keeping his numbers over his toes. His lateral agility and change of direction skills are very impressive and he is a natural knee bender and fluid athlete. He is light on his feet and technically and fundamentally sound. Briggs is an aggressive football player who works hard to make plays. He wants to win. He uses his hands very well, has natural pop and power and can get low and really jolt bigger blockers. He sheds very well. Briggs has improved every year since entering the NFL. He is a decent blitzer and times it well, but isn't a big sack guy and doesn't have a variety of different moves as a pass rusher. At times, he can be overly aggressive, but this problem has become more and more of a rarity. Finding true negatives with Briggs isn't easy to do.

Last edited by losgigantes, 2/28/2008, 12:20 pm


---
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little." - GEORGE CARLIN
2/28/2008, 12:18 pm   
 
losgigantes
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 12-2007
Location: South Bay
Posts: 1192
Avatar
Reply | Quote



Why do you think Hackett is better than Berrian? Neither were ever on my fantasy teams so I really haven't followed them, but to me, Berrian seems like a much safer bet. He's only a year older, but has been in the league twice as long, and has A LOT more receptions. Hackett hasn't really shown anything. But again, I haven't followed them so my opinion is purely speculative emoticon

Last edited by losgigantes, 2/28/2008, 5:45 pm


---
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little." - GEORGE CARLIN
2/28/2008, 12:26 pm   
 
TheMalcontent
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 10-2006
Location: Gotham
Posts: 2271
Avatar
Reply | Quote



Barrian and Briggs would be a bad move.

The only way I see us signing Briggs is if we were switching to a 4-3 since he plays the same position as Patrick Willis in the 3-4. If we stayed in the 3-4 Briggs would be asked to do the same thing he was complaining about in Chicago, which is being the ILB that takes on blocks to allow the other ILB to make the play. The analogy that best works is that Willis is playing the RB position and Briggs would be playing the FB position of the defense.

Barrian isn't a WR that fits Martz style of offense, he is a stretch the field type of receiver and Martz likes to use WR in crossing rountes and over the middle kind of stuff.

---
Image
2/28/2008, 5:55 pm   
 
losgigantes
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 12-2007
Location: South Bay
Posts: 1192
Avatar
Reply | Quote



I see. What about isaac bruce? Old as dirt, but you know martz loves him.

---
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little." - GEORGE CARLIN
2/29/2008, 1:39 am   
 
209Giant
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user

Registered: 04-2007
Location: Above the Fray
Posts: 3262
Reply | Quote



Justin Smiley....was he any good? I saw that he signed with teh Fish in Miami
2/29/2008, 10:55 am   
 
bayareasportsfan755
ALL-STAR POSTER
Global user

Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 498
Reply | Quote
posticon Re: …


quote:

losgigantes wrote:

Why do you think Hackett is better than Berrian? Neither were ever on my fantasy teams so I really haven't followed them, but to me, Berrian seems like a much safer bet. He's only a year older, but has been in the league twice as long, and has A LOT more receptions. Hackett hasn't really shown anything. But again, I haven't followed them so my opinion is purely speculative emoticon



I just think he's got better hands, and is a better route runner. He only played 6 games last season but managed to grab 32 passes. Not bad.

Anyways, now that Berrian looks like hes going to Oakland, Hackett is the clear cut #1 WR available. Number two would probably be Bryant Johnson, Javon Walker, or Donte Stallworth (I'm not counting Moss because I don't think he's leaving NE).

I'm actually a Bronco fan. So I'm actually hoping the niners don't get Hackett emoticon.
2/29/2008, 4:40 pm   
 
bayareasportsfan755
ALL-STAR POSTER
Global user

Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 498
Reply | Quote



49ers sign DE Justin Smith


49ers signed DE Justin Smith to a six-year, $45 million contract. The deal includes $20 million in guarantees.
He never made it to Minneapolis. Smith, the No. 4 pick in 2001, will be used often with his hand up in San Francisco's 3-4, allowing Tully Banta-Cain to be a nickel rusher. He'll also see a good amount of action at end in the Niners' 4-3 fronts. Smith hasn't played linebacker as a pro, but has the motor and athleticism to be effective there. He's a good player who is getting paid to be great.
3/1/2008, 10:14 am   
 




Quick Reply


Page:  1  2 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 10/11/2008, 3:04 pm
deep bitter hatred
<

>BACK TO THE TOP<

LINKS
Retrosheet - Baseball Reference - Umpire Stats
The Baseball Cube w/ Minor Stats - Baseball HQ pay site
Fantasy Baseball Hub - Hardball Dollars - Cot's Contracts
McCovey Chronicles - Dodger Blues - KNBR Giants Shows
The Sporting News - Seat Data - Extra Baggs
OFFICIAL SF Giants Message Board - Active Roster - 40 Man Roster
San Francisco Giants 2008 Schedule - SF Gate on ATT Park
GiantsFan9's Blog - Your Giants of Korea - SFDugout.com
LINKS OF FAME