Page: 1 2
irishbum
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user
Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 1453

|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Quentin: Buy low.
why would you trade Cain for more prospects marco?
if Alderson and Bumgardner are future rotation guys wouldnt you like to get a stud bat in return for arguably the best pitcher in the NL at the present moment
|
|
6/26/2009, 4:08 pm
|
|
Xellos007
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user
Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 1146
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: …
quote: Bhaakon wrote:
I'm pretty sure they would hang up on that offer (I know I would). Would you trade Sandoval for that package? Because, even with the injuries, that's probably about how much Quentin means to the Sox's future.
Slightly off topic, but I was listening to Tolbert early this afternoon and he related a scouting report on Alderson from one of his buddies (who happens to work as a scout for the Rangers, making his annual rotation through through Norwich). It wasn't a favorable review: Alderson gets by with excellent command of a high-80's fastball and average secondary pitches, mid-rotation upside; it really made him sound like Yusmeiro Petit or Jerome Williams redux (my names, not his). If that's how other organizations see him, I think we may be overestimating his trade value (and possibly his prospect ranking).
The report on Bumgarner was sunnier. Top of the rotation potential with an elite fastball, but his secondary pitches are still works in progress, and he's probably farther off than most Giants fans seem to think.
that is alderson scouting report out of high school.
low 90 fastball with plus plus command.
http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/events/draft_report/y2007/tracker.jsp?mc=alderson
---  Officially on the FIRE SABEAN and Bochy bandwagon
|
|
6/26/2009, 4:14 pm
|
|
Bhaakon
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user
Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 3493
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Quentin: Buy low.
quote: I would give something big like Angel and Alderson because that's what I think he's worth.
For Quentin, I tend to agree. I'd be absolutely thrilled if Villalona ever hit like Quentin has, and he'll never have the defensive value. Even if I new Angel would pan out, I'd strongly consider trading five years of good hitting two or three seasons from now (and I say five because it's unreasonable to expect him to emerge as a middle of the order hitter in his rookie season) for three years of good hitting right now.
|
|
6/26/2009, 8:18 pm
|
|
MarcoPolo666
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user
Registered: 07-2007
Posts: 4732
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Quentin: Buy low.
quote: irishbum wrote:
why would you trade Cain for more prospects marco?
if Alderson and Bumgardner are future rotation guys wouldnt you like to get a stud bat in return for arguably the best pitcher in the NL at the present moment
I thought I was pretty clear :
If MadBum and Alderson come up mid-year 2010 (and are successful #2 and #3 starters), that makes Cain tradable for a super-package of great prospects.
To re-state : IF we have a (somewhat) proven replacement for Cain, then we trade the guy with fewer years left, and keep the cheap guy who looks like a valid replacement, while filling the minors with a boatload of prospects. IF nobody offers quality prospects, then ****em' and we keep Cain.
|
|
6/26/2009, 8:51 pm
|
|
MarcoPolo666
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user
Registered: 07-2007
Posts: 4732
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
…
Although maybe I didn't understand the question. If the question is why not replace him NOW, the answer is "because there isn't a PROVEN replacement arm ready".
|
|
6/26/2009, 8:53 pm
|
|
MarcoPolo666
HALL OF FAME POSTER
Global user
Registered: 07-2007
Posts: 4732
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Quentin: Buy low.
quote: chefjuan wrote:
quote: MarcoPolo666 wrote:
If MadBum and Alderson come up mid-year 2010
(and are successful #2 and #3 starters), that makes Cain tradable for a super-package of great prospects.
The success is the key to that statement. It took Cain three full years to reach his potential. Even if these two are more advanced when they get here, I'm still expecting them to be performing at that level until 2011 or 12. Lincecum is a special talent to become to dominant so fast.
I can see your point, and my response is "yes and no". First, throw out the W-L record. That is a bull**** way to judge a pitcher; W-L is a TEAM stat, not a pitching stat. You can look at ERA, ERA+, WHIP, K/9, H/9, BB/9, whatever. He is pretty much the same pitcher he has been since he came to the league. Is he a better pitcher now? Yup. Why is he "so much better" now? Well, first, he isn't trying to strike everybody out, and thus goes deeper into games (including 3 complete games this year, equal to the number of the last 3 years combined - his ERA isn't dependent as much on the pen). Second, his team is hitting, and the defense is better (Cain is a fly-ball pitcher, so the crap at SS doesn't hurt him as much.)
Is he a better pitcher? Yes. But not as much better as you would think : he actually has run support this year, which is the biggest difference.
|
|
6/26/2009, 9:48 pm
|
|

Quick Reply
Page: 1 2
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 11/30/2009, 10:49 pm
|
|
|