Slander Policy ~ at Runboard.com
Google
              Jump to Bottom
Polymath
 General Info
  Slander Policy
Support
Search

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 

 
joydakiss
HBIC
Global user (premium)

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 14174
Karma: 135 (+186/-51)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Slander Policy


this topic will go to the general info forum shortly.

to all: the Polymath administrators do NOT condone slander. please refrain from posting information on this forum that is malicious and/or defamatory to any or all posters.

we will assume that you will take the time to read this message. posting material that would subject Polymath or its administrators to lawsuit will result in permanent banning from the board.

this policy is effective from now on.

emoticon

Last edited by joydakiss, 1/21/2008, 5:46 pm


---
We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are. ~ Talmud

Image
1/21/2008, 5:40 pm Send Email to joydakiss   Send PM to joydakiss
 
wralst
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 2513
Karma: 11 (+11/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



Fair Enough
1/21/2008, 5:49 pm Send Email to wralst   Send PM to wralst
 
barrister
Knight of the Order
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 2585
Karma: 17 (+31/-14)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



Because we are in "legal land", I feel the need to comment. First, what do you mean by "malicious". Because you have made the grounds for banning to be an "and/or", either defamatory OR malicious "information" is punishable. I would say that calling someone a vile name, or intentionally parodying someone would be "malicious". Being called an effing moron and idiot would be malicious.

More clarity please

Next, how are you going to know if a comment is defamatory? First, truth is a defense to defamation. Who are you going to believe and why? Wralst, please don't take offense here, because I fully suspect that libby lied about your military history, but that requires me to believe you and not him, in order to get to the conclusion that he defamed you. On what evidence? Your word? I don't think that is sufficient basis. IMO. Defamation also requires actually damages. How is someone actually harmed by a lie about them on an ananymous message board?

Banning is a bad idea. If someone says something wrong, contest it and let the members decide who to believe

---
Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum
1/21/2008, 5:57 pm Send Email to barrister   Send PM to barrister
 
wralst
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 2513
Karma: 11 (+11/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



Well professionally I am in loss control in the liability insurance world so here's the definition:

Insurance Dictionary: Defamation of Character
Oral or written statement that results in injuring the good name or reputation of another, causing that individual to be held in disrepute.

1/21/2008, 6:01 pm Send Email to wralst   Send PM to wralst
 
joydakiss
HBIC
Global user (premium)

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 14174
Karma: 135 (+186/-51)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



I KNEW you'd ask. emoticon

I will amend...malicious and defamatory.

I understand that calling people vile names can be perceived as malicious, and that one cannot prove whether or not the message is a misrepresentation of a poster's private information solely for the purposes of maligning the poster's reputation until after the fact.

however, it is where maliciousness meets defamation that I cross the line. do you know what I mean?

in other words, do I agree with someone getting so angry at another poster that they post their private address or phone number? or they post information about someone's personal work history? hell no. emoticon I don't play that crap.

---
We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are. ~ Talmud

Image
1/21/2008, 6:06 pm Send Email to joydakiss   Send PM to joydakiss
 
barrister
Knight of the Order
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 2585
Karma: 17 (+31/-14)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



Pretty broad definition.

If I say that a particular poster must be on drugs because everything they say is totally nuts - I get banned. It impune their character.

If I say that a particular poster is clearly mentally deficient and nothing that comes out of their mouth (fingers) is credible because they obviously are learning disabled - I get banned.

If I say a particular poster is malicious racist ...

If I say a particular poster has sex with dogs ...

...

Bad idea

---
Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum
1/21/2008, 6:09 pm Send Email to barrister   Send PM to barrister
 
barrister
Knight of the Order
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 2585
Karma: 17 (+31/-14)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: …


quote:

joydakiss wrote:

I KNEW you'd ask. emoticon

I will amend...malicious and defamatory.

I understand that calling people vile names can be perceived as malicious, and that one cannot prove whether or not the message is a misrepresentation of a poster's private information solely for the purposes of maligning the poster's reputation until after the fact.

however, it is where maliciousness meets defamation that I cross the line. do you know what I mean?

in other words, do I agree with someone getting so angry at another poster that they post their private address or phone number? or they post information about someone's personal work history? hell no. emoticon I don't play that crap.




Just to be clear here, because you are making a "policy" - none of that is defamation. That is posting personal information. You don't know if the information is true or not and it is only harmful if it is true, in which case, by definition, it isn't defamatory.

If it is false, the victim can simply say so.


---
Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum
1/21/2008, 6:12 pm Send Email to barrister   Send PM to barrister
 
joydakiss
HBIC
Global user (premium)

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 14174
Karma: 135 (+186/-51)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



it's only harmful if the information is not true, I thought.

---
We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are. ~ Talmud

Image
1/21/2008, 6:16 pm Send Email to joydakiss   Send PM to joydakiss
 
barrister
Knight of the Order
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 2585
Karma: 17 (+31/-14)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: …


quote:

joydakiss wrote:

it's only harmful if the information is not true, I thought.



How can I be harmed if someone posts a wrong or made up address or phone number or work place about me? No one can track me down from that.

How are you going to know if personal history or work history is true except by picking sides in a fight?

---
Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum
1/21/2008, 6:22 pm Send Email to barrister   Send PM to barrister
 
joydakiss
HBIC
Global user (premium)

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 14174
Karma: 135 (+186/-51)
Avatar
Reply | Quote



ok I see what you mean.

in the case of posting personal information, that is malicious.

in the case of posting erroneous information, that is defamatory.

I don't want anyone here publishing information that might subject me or the board to lawsuit. according to wralst, libby's posting about wralst's record is a crime.

---
We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are. ~ Talmud

Image
1/21/2008, 6:26 pm Send Email to joydakiss   Send PM to joydakiss
 


Add a reply



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/21/2008, 9:37 pm